As a result, the fit was dismissed since the plaintiff had not succeeded in proving that the gift was, in fact, a sale. Onus of Proof: The court emphasised the onus to verify the genuineness from the present was upon the beneficiary (plaintiff). Once the reward was denied, this issue https://land-ownership-and-title62978.ampedpages.com/the-basic-principles-of-co-ownership-and-partition-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-58456670